Editorial policy
Editorial Policy
PeriodlyWise is built for people who may be trying to understand a late period, a confusing symptom, or a pattern they would rather not explain twice. Our content should feel calm, useful, and honest about what a cycle tracker can and cannot tell you.
Last updated: July 7, 2026
Medical review
PeriodlyWise publishes educational menstrual health content to help readers understand cycle patterns, symptoms, tracking habits, and when it may be appropriate to seek professional care. Because menstrual health topics can affect personal wellbeing, selected articles may be medically reviewed for accuracy, clarity, and responsible language.
When an article is marked as medically reviewed, it has been reviewed by a qualified medical reviewer. Medical review focuses on whether the content is medically reasonable, avoids unsupported claims, uses careful wording around symptoms and possible causes, and includes appropriate reminders to seek professional care when symptoms are severe, unusual, persistent, or concerning.
A medical review does not mean the article is a diagnosis, treatment plan, clinical consultation, or substitute for speaking with a qualified healthcare professional. PeriodlyWise does not provide emergency care, personal medical advice, or individualized interpretation of symptoms.
Medical review may include checking:
- Whether symptom explanations are presented carefully and accurately.
- Whether the article avoids diagnosing readers or replacing clinical advice.
- Whether red-flag symptoms and when-to-get-help guidance are responsibly stated.
- Whether the tone is supportive, non-alarming, and easy to understand.
- Whether the article clearly separates general education from personal medical advice.
Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS)
For translated articles, PeriodlyWise aims to preserve the meaning and caution of the original article. Unless separately stated, translated versions are based on the medically reviewed English source and are reviewed editorially for clarity, formatting, and accuracy of meaning.
Our editorial principles
How we create and review content
The goal is not to sound clinical for the sake of sounding clinical. The goal is to make cycle information easier to understand while staying inside our limits.
- We choose topics from common cycle-tracking questions, tool workflows, and reader concerns that fit PeriodlyWise's educational purpose.
- We separate estimate-based guidance from medical claims. If a topic needs diagnosis, treatment, emergency care, contraception decisions, or fertility treatment decisions, we say so clearly.
- We favor specific, useful wording over broad reassurance. For example, we encourage tracking what changed, when it changed, how often it happens, and whether symptoms affect daily life.
- We add internal links where they genuinely help, so readers can move from policy to tools, blog guides, privacy information, calculation details, or contact options without searching around.
Where our guidance stops
PeriodlyWise can help organize cycle dates and patterns. It cannot confirm pregnancy, diagnose PCOS, endometriosis, fibroids, infections, anemia, thyroid concerns, or any other condition. It also cannot decide whether a symptom is safe for you personally.
When content mentions symptoms such as heavy bleeding, severe pain, fainting, unusual discharge, possible pregnancy, or major cycle changes, the purpose is to help readers recognize when professional advice may be appropriate, not to replace that advice.
Transparency, advertising, and feedback
If PeriodlyWise displays advertising, sponsored content, affiliate links, or promotional placements, relevant policy pages should explain that clearly. Editorial content should not pretend that advertising is independent education.
Reader feedback matters. If something feels unclear, outdated, too medical, not careful enough, or simply unhelpful, the contact page is the right place to send a correction or suggestion.